MUPJ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Ligne 1: | Ligne 1: | ||
--[[User:Chollet|Chollet]] 11:41, 27 janvier 2010 (CET) | --[[User:Chollet|Chollet]] 11:41, 27 janvier 2010 (CET) | ||
Support of Multi-user pilot jobs (MUPJ) for LHC VOs | == [https://wlcg-tf.hep.ac.uk/wiki/Multi_User_Pilot_Jobs Pilot jobs working group of the Technical Forum (wiki)] == | ||
== Support of Multi-user pilot jobs (MUPJ) for LHC VOs == | |||
In December 09, the [http://lcg.web.cern.ch/LCG/mb.htm WLCG Management Board] asked the [https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LCG/WLCGTechnicalForum WLCG Technical Forum] to provide recommendations on the use of multi-user pilot jobs, in particular on the deployment and configuration of glexec and its usage by the experiment | In December 09, the [http://lcg.web.cern.ch/LCG/mb.htm WLCG Management Board] asked the [https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LCG/WLCGTechnicalForum WLCG Technical Forum] to provide recommendations on the use of multi-user pilot jobs, in particular on the deployment and configuration of glexec and its usage by the experiment | ||
Ligne 15: | Ligne 17: | ||
** [http://indico.in2p3.fr/getFile.py/access?contribId=3&resId=1&materialId=slides&confId=2601 Pierre Girard's presentation] (restricted access to t2t3 group) | ** [http://indico.in2p3.fr/getFile.py/access?contribId=3&resId=1&materialId=slides&confId=2601 Pierre Girard's presentation] (restricted access to t2t3 group) | ||
** [http://indico.in2p3.fr/materialDisplay.py?materialId=0&confId=2601 Collective answer from sites]sent to Maarten Litmaath has been attached to the meeting agenda as well (restricted access to t2t3 group) | ** [http://indico.in2p3.fr/materialDisplay.py?materialId=0&confId=2601 Collective answer from sites]sent to Maarten Litmaath has been attached to the meeting agenda as well (restricted access to t2t3 group) | ||
[[Image:MUPJ-SupportFR-2.png]] | |||
* [http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?sessionId=7&resId=1&materialId=0&confId=84636 Status report@March 2010 GDB] | |||
- MUPJ in principle supported | |||
- Most of the sites/resources compatible with glexec setuid | |||
o many sites require it in the medium terms | |||
o strongly preferred by CMS and ATLAS | |||
- Many sites prohibit bypassing glexec on internal errors (with some tolerance for the time being) | |||
- Site concerns : | |||
Batch jobs clean-up (complications of), some incompatibilities with afs in setuid mode, | |||
how can local users gets special share/priorities ?, strong concerns about MUPJ concept expresseb bu NorduGrid | |||
- Proposed actions : | |||
o sites should configure glexec with SCAS/Argus/GUMS backend and advertise it with GlueCECapability : glexec | |||
glexec/SCAS testing chain in validation - new ops/role=pilot - will be integrated in the next release of national nagios | |||
o experiments should try out their glexec workflows at such sites as they become available | |||
o sites that do not support the setuid mode would no longer receive MUPJ | |||
o others technologies (such as virtualization) may affect medium-term strategies | |||
- In conclusion, MB agrreed that a detailed plan for glexec deployment in setuid mode in WLCG sites is required | |||
- Milestone for T0/T1 sites | |||
== Links == | |||
* Glasgow wiki page (glexec and SCAS installation and configuration) | |||
https://www.scotgrid.ac.uk/wiki/index.php/Glasgow_GLite_gLExec_installation_and_configuration | |||
* http://glite.web.cern.ch/glite/packages/R3.2/sl5_x86_64/deployment/glite-GLEXEC_wn/glite-GLEXEC_wn.asp |
Latest revision as of 17:22, 14 avril 2010
--Chollet 11:41, 27 janvier 2010 (CET)
Pilot jobs working group of the Technical Forum (wiki)
Support of Multi-user pilot jobs (MUPJ) for LHC VOs
In December 09, the WLCG Management Board asked the WLCG Technical Forum to provide recommendations on the use of multi-user pilot jobs, in particular on the deployment and configuration of glexec and its usage by the experiment frameworks.
- Document that describes what pilot jobs are, their benefits, disadvantages and other aspects that sites and experiments may need to be aware of, is available here : https://wlcg-tf.hep.ac.uk/wiki/Multi_User_Pilot_Jobs (IGTF certificate required)
- "Traceability and Logging" and "Grid Pilot Jobs" policies available at http://www.jspg.org/wiki/JSPG_Docs
- Questionnaire for site admins : https://wlcg-tf.hep.ac.uk/wiki/Multi_User_Pilot_Jobs#Questionnaire
- See T2-T3 Technical Meeting, January 22
- Pierre Girard's presentation (restricted access to t2t3 group)
- Collective answer from sitessent to Maarten Litmaath has been attached to the meeting agenda as well (restricted access to t2t3 group)
- MUPJ in principle supported - Most of the sites/resources compatible with glexec setuid o many sites require it in the medium terms o strongly preferred by CMS and ATLAS - Many sites prohibit bypassing glexec on internal errors (with some tolerance for the time being) - Site concerns : Batch jobs clean-up (complications of), some incompatibilities with afs in setuid mode, how can local users gets special share/priorities ?, strong concerns about MUPJ concept expresseb bu NorduGrid - Proposed actions : o sites should configure glexec with SCAS/Argus/GUMS backend and advertise it with GlueCECapability : glexec glexec/SCAS testing chain in validation - new ops/role=pilot - will be integrated in the next release of national nagios o experiments should try out their glexec workflows at such sites as they become available o sites that do not support the setuid mode would no longer receive MUPJ o others technologies (such as virtualization) may affect medium-term strategies - In conclusion, MB agrreed that a detailed plan for glexec deployment in setuid mode in WLCG sites is required - Milestone for T0/T1 sites
Links
- Glasgow wiki page (glexec and SCAS installation and configuration)
https://www.scotgrid.ac.uk/wiki/index.php/Glasgow_GLite_gLExec_installation_and_configuration