Difference between revisions of "MUPJ"

Un article de lcgwiki.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Support of Multi-user pilot jobs (MUPJ) for LHC VOs)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Ligne 1: Ligne 1:
 
--[[User:Chollet|Chollet]] 11:41, 27 janvier 2010 (CET)
 
--[[User:Chollet|Chollet]] 11:41, 27 janvier 2010 (CET)
  
== [https://wlcg-tf.hep.ac.uk/wiki/Multi_User_Pilot_Jobs Pilot jobs working group of the Technical Forum (wiki)]
+
== [https://wlcg-tf.hep.ac.uk/wiki/Multi_User_Pilot_Jobs Pilot jobs working group of the Technical Forum (wiki)] ==
  
 
== Support of Multi-user pilot jobs (MUPJ) for LHC VOs ==
 
== Support of Multi-user pilot jobs (MUPJ) for LHC VOs ==
Ligne 17: Ligne 17:
 
** [http://indico.in2p3.fr/getFile.py/access?contribId=3&resId=1&materialId=slides&confId=2601 Pierre Girard's presentation] (restricted access to t2t3 group)
 
** [http://indico.in2p3.fr/getFile.py/access?contribId=3&resId=1&materialId=slides&confId=2601 Pierre Girard's presentation] (restricted access to t2t3 group)
 
** [http://indico.in2p3.fr/materialDisplay.py?materialId=0&confId=2601 Collective answer from sites]sent to Maarten Litmaath has been attached to the meeting agenda as well (restricted access to t2t3 group)
 
** [http://indico.in2p3.fr/materialDisplay.py?materialId=0&confId=2601 Collective answer from sites]sent to Maarten Litmaath has been attached to the meeting agenda as well (restricted access to t2t3 group)
 +
[[Image:MUPJ-SupportFR-2.png]]
  
== Links ===
+
*  [http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?sessionId=7&resId=1&materialId=0&confId=84636 Status report@March 2010 GDB]
 +
- MUPJ in principle supported
 +
- Most of the sites/resources compatible with glexec setuid
 +
    o many sites require it in the medium terms
 +
    o strongly preferred by CMS and ATLAS
 +
- Many sites prohibit bypassing glexec on internal errors (with some tolerance for the time being)
 +
- Site concerns :
 +
      Batch jobs clean-up (complications of), some incompatibilities with afs in setuid mode,
 +
      how can local users gets special share/priorities ?, strong concerns about MUPJ concept expresseb bu NorduGrid
 +
- Proposed actions :
 +
    o sites should configure glexec with SCAS/Argus/GUMS backend and advertise it with GlueCECapability : glexec
 +
      glexec/SCAS testing chain in validation - new ops/role=pilot - will be integrated in the next release of national nagios
 +
    o experiments should try out their glexec workflows at such sites as they become available
 +
    o sites that do not support the setuid mode would no longer receive MUPJ
 +
    o others technologies (such as virtualization) may affect medium-term strategies
 +
- In conclusion, MB agrreed that a detailed plan for glexec deployment in setuid mode in WLCG sites is required
 +
- Milestone for T0/T1 sites
 +
 
 +
== Links ==
 
* Glasgow wiki page (glexec and SCAS installation and configuration)
 
* Glasgow wiki page (glexec and SCAS installation and configuration)
 
https://www.scotgrid.ac.uk/wiki/index.php/Glasgow_GLite_gLExec_installation_and_configuration
 
https://www.scotgrid.ac.uk/wiki/index.php/Glasgow_GLite_gLExec_installation_and_configuration
 +
* http://glite.web.cern.ch/glite/packages/R3.2/sl5_x86_64/deployment/glite-GLEXEC_wn/glite-GLEXEC_wn.asp

Latest revision as of 16:22, 14 avril 2010

--Chollet 11:41, 27 janvier 2010 (CET)

Pilot jobs working group of the Technical Forum (wiki)

Support of Multi-user pilot jobs (MUPJ) for LHC VOs

In December 09, the WLCG Management Board asked the WLCG Technical Forum to provide recommendations on the use of multi-user pilot jobs, in particular on the deployment and configuration of glexec and its usage by the experiment frameworks.

MUPJ-SupportFR-2.png

- MUPJ in principle supported
- Most of the sites/resources compatible with glexec setuid 
    o many sites require it in the medium terms
    o strongly preferred by CMS and ATLAS
- Many sites prohibit bypassing glexec on internal errors (with some tolerance for the time being)
- Site concerns :
     Batch jobs clean-up (complications of), some incompatibilities with afs in setuid mode, 
     how can local users gets special share/priorities ?, strong concerns about MUPJ concept expresseb bu NorduGrid 
- Proposed actions :
    o sites should configure glexec with SCAS/Argus/GUMS backend and advertise it with GlueCECapability : glexec
      glexec/SCAS testing chain in validation - new ops/role=pilot - will be integrated in the next release of national nagios
    o experiments should try out their glexec workflows at such sites as they become available
    o sites that do not support the setuid mode would no longer receive MUPJ 
    o others technologies (such as virtualization) may affect medium-term strategies
- In conclusion, MB agrreed that a detailed plan for glexec deployment in setuid mode in WLCG sites is required
- Milestone for T0/T1 sites

Links

  • Glasgow wiki page (glexec and SCAS installation and configuration)

https://www.scotgrid.ac.uk/wiki/index.php/Glasgow_GLite_gLExec_installation_and_configuration